「放射冷却現象」と「温室効果」についての質問です
The upper Japanese means
the following.
It is a question about "The Radiative cooling
phenomenon" and "The Greenhouse effect."
I made my Internet debut with this question.
The contents of the question are the next.
The 2nd law of thermodynamics does not accept the Radiative
cooling phenomenon and the Greenhouse effect.
The Radiative
cooling phenomenon and the Greenhouse
effect are wrong.
I brought forth a counterargument to much replies.
And I think that the next counterargument turned into a
conclusion.
Counterargument
***************
There are many sites which are introducing the Radiation equilibrium temperature.
There are many sites which are introducing the Radiation equilibrium temperature.
Refer to such a site for a concrete formula.
For example
http://kobam.hp.infoseek.co.jp/meteor/radiation-balance.html.
It is a simple formula.
I think that it is not difficult to calculate.
You will get to know that the next calculation is
required.
(The surface area of the earth)÷(The cross-sectional area)。
"The distance from center of the earth" and
"The Radiation equilibrium temperature" are not related.
Temperature at an above sea level of 0 meter.
Temperature at the Mt. Fuji top
Temperature at 10km of high skies.
All temperature, such as this, will be the same values.
Even if the size of the earth becomes half, radiation
equilibrium temperature does not change.
The Ministry of Environment of Japan said the basis of the
Greenhouse effect as follows.
If there is no greenhouse gas, it is said that ... and
average temperature will be -19 ℃.
-19 ℃ is radiation equilibrium temperature.
Probably, same explanation is given also in your country
USA.
It is wrong.
It is clear also in the following example.
Where is the ground surface of Jupiter or Saturn? .
There is ground surface neither Jupiter nor Saturn.
You cannot say the next.
The radiation equilibrium temperature is the temperature of
ground surface.
You may have the following question.
Is the high temperature of Venus for the Greenhouse
effect?
This is also the explanation often used for greenhouse
effect.
However, fundamental physics study clarifies the
following thing.
If you were close to the surface of Venus 100m, 1 ℃ temperature rise.
Bases are a principle of conservation of energy and the
2nd law of thermodynamics.
Supposing you are interested, please see Dry
Adiabat Lapse Rate.
Venus has 50km between clouds and surface.
500 ℃ of the difference in
temperature is needed.
And it is just like that.
People who do not understand the following thing assert the Greenhouse effect of Venus.
People who do not understand the following thing assert the Greenhouse effect of Venus.
Fundamental physics of freshman college level.
You should stop a researcher, if they are researchers.
Greenhouse effect does not exist.
By the way
There is no law of conservation of the number of photons.
There is no law of conservation of the number of photons.
You may have heard the following.
Greenhouse effect said.
" Infrared rays accumulated and
an atmospheric temperature went up. "
This is fraud theory with malice.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿